Here is a thought-provoking article from Yale University. It states, in part,
The only substantial disagreement with the essay is the "need" to decarbonize. If we aren't sure about 'global warming' then CO2 levels are moot -- in fact, one can make a reasonable argument that more CO2 is better.
For me, nuclear and solar make tremendous sense on their own regardless of carbon considerations.
Hat tip: Watts Up With That.