The paragraph above is from the best single analysis I have read that explains why spending huge sums of money to deal with global warming will almost certainly result in a negative return-on-investment. Highly recommended article, just click here.
- The hugely unfavorable cost to benefit ratio explained above
- The more important environmental problems we face that we know how to solve for a lot less money than global warming (polluted drinking water, malaria, and - in some cases - invasive species, to name three)
The decision not to "tackle" global warming (in the word of the author) is a no-brainer.
Hat tip: Judy Curry.