Correction to the Locations included in the Tornado Warning Test

By -
I have an incorrect list of the National Weather Service offices participating in the test of the severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings I write about below. Here is the correct list:

  • St. Louis (meaning part of Illinois is included)

  • Springfield (meaning traumatized Joplin will be experimented upon)

  • Kansas City

  • Topeka

  • Wichita


To the best of my knowledge, the rest of the posting is correct. Thanks to Chance Hayes and Chad Omitt for the correct list of offices.

Comments

  1. ElaineFebruary 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM

    Soooo... this means the area and the number of people being "experimented upon" is significantly MORE than we originally thought, right? Although half of Kansas has been dropped we now have almost ALL of Missouri (save for a few counties covered by Paducah or Memphis NWS offices) and a sizeable chunk of Illinois in play.

    ReplyDelete
  2. MikeFebruary 18, 2012 at 1:32 AM

    That is correct.

    I spoke with a Joplinite on Thursday and, as you would expect, she describes the people there as "traumatized." The last thing they need is experimentation when it comes to tornadoes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ElaineFebruary 18, 2012 at 1:59 AM

    What if the experiment had been limited to, say, one or two NWS offices in Kansas, Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle or some other relatively sparsely populated area that had NOT recently suffered significant/killer tornadoes?

    Bringing KC and STL and the Metro East area of IL (and, of course, Joplin) into the mix right off the bat is taking a pretty darn big gamble. I suppose it could be compared to making a test flight of a controversial new aircraft that no one knows for sure will even get off the ground, with just the pilot and a few crew members on board, vs. flying it almost fully loaded with passengers (and "captive" passengers at that).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rob DaleFebruary 18, 2012 at 2:30 AM

    Elaine - that's not at all what is being done. Nothing personal, but everyone is under the assumption that every NWS meteorologist, TV weathercaster, and emergency manager is an idiot.

    While there may be some - the majority clearly are not as stupid as people commenting here think.

    ReplyDelete
  5. MikeFebruary 18, 2012 at 2:45 AM

    Rob,

    While I believe that TV meteorologists and NWS meteorologists are certainly not "stupid", there is nothing to be gained by adding complexity to the warning system.

    Notice that I did not comment here on emergency managers. I just posted a revised piece about EM's and there are many unfortunate decisions being made by EM's right now.

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rob DaleFebruary 18, 2012 at 3:09 AM

    There is plenty to be gained. A reduction in TORs is a VERY good thing. I guess we can disagree to disagree ;) Honestly I don't understand why you would rather those spin-up 65mph eddies get 9-county blanket tornado warnings as they do under the existing system.

    ReplyDelete
  7. MikeFebruary 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM

    This is the source of our disagreement: I do not see a reduction in TORs. I see far more TORs as they ratchet up the warning type when a debris ball appears. And, I see many more SVRs containing "A tornado is possible" as a means of CYA whether there is any rotation indicated or not.

    Once the "tornado is possible" sentence (which is a form of CYA from where I sit) has been issued, EM's (see posting above) will start sounding sirens, schools will put kids in hallways, etc. Vast overwarning.

    Over the years, I've recommended to the NWS they issue "Hail Warnings" or "Extreme Wind" warning and abolish the SVR. For a squall line tornado, they could cover it with an Extreme Wind Warning for, say, 100 mph winds. I'd have no problems with an EM blowing the sirens for that (assuming that type of warning was appropriately rare).

    Now, however, we are regressing and EM's are making the decision to blow the sirens for 1" hail. Massive Overwarning ---> Complacency ----> People Not Taking Shelter When the Threat is Real.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Steve ManeikisFebruary 19, 2012 at 8:56 AM

    Copied from the other discussion--"I’m not sure I see why siren activation will be reduced with this new system, maybe this part of the problem. If they are issuing SVRs with the line “a tornado is possible” (and isn’t that already in a TS Warning?) are the “siren authorities” going to react differently than before since this is a new system. Are the new SVRs supposed to signaling something different? What is a school going to do? Or my workplace? I’m giving a storm talk to dorm students at the college where I teach and now I wonder what to tell them about the meaning of sirens, when/why they are activated (which is already confusing enough around here). That “we”, who are supposedly more knowledgeable about these things, are confused, doesn’t portend very well for when this is introduced to the public, especially last-minute."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dave FloydFebruary 21, 2012 at 7:25 AM

    Hi Mike,

    You mentioned there has been no public notice about this topic. Not sure if the other WCMs already pointed you in this direction, but a PNS was issued earlier this month:
    http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/notification/pns12exp_cr_tor_svr_svs-cca.htm.

    There is also a link in that document pointing to the Product Description Document:
    http://products.weather.gov/PDD/PDD_CR_IBW_011012.pdf

    Hope this helps!

    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  10. MikeFebruary 21, 2012 at 11:47 AM

    Neither are "public" notices as the former runs on the FOS and other limited distribution means. People don't have DDS in their homes.

    There is still no notice on, for example, the home pages of the WFO's affected.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hilary's Forecast Path Shifts West; Updated 9:20am PDT

By -
Image
The forecast path of the center of Hilary has shifted a bit to the west. This increases the threat to the Southland, especially in terms of flooding.  Rainfall Note the heavy rains are forecast for Los Angeles County. Serious flash flooding may result. Because the forecast path has shifted to the west, that increases the threat of serious flooding in Los Angeles County north into Yosemite and the southern Sierra. It lessens the threat in Utah and western Arizona. While the threat of widespread flooding in Utah and Arizona lessens, note that some thunderstorms with localized heavy rain show up on the map.  In Nevada, the more western path increases the risk of serious flooding around Mt Charleston and into the central part of the state.  Here is the updated  (9am PDT) flash flood risk map. Wind There are already about 40,000 people without power in California, mostly in the center of the state.  The maps above are the peak gusts forecasted with the storm. The highest winds, in general,
Read more

Dangerous Travel Conditions - People Reportedly Stranded

By -
Image
-- Note, more current info available. Scroll up. --- Updated Information as of 8am PDT You are risking your life if you attempt to travel through the purple area.  While the rain has not begun in coastal California, I would urge you to use this time to make any preparations. Power outages have occurred already in southeast California. Here is the latest radar as of 7:55am PDT. As of 6:40am PDT , the radar indicates moderate to heavy rain falling over desert areas of Southern California and far western Arizona (click to enlarge).  Rainfall amounts for the 24 hours ending at 7am PDT show more than two inches have already fallen. There are reports from reliable sources that roads are already washed out and that people are stranded in isolated parts of the desert.  Below is a high-resolution computer model's rainfall forecast from 5am PDT to 11pm PDT Sunday. More than a foot of additional rain is forecast to fall. This will lead to catastrophic flooding.  Here is a map of current watc
Read more

Update on Tornado and Wind Potential; 12 Noon PDT

By -
Image
There was at least one tornado and at least one funnel cloud yesterday.  --- original forecast --- Hilary (the swirly symbol) continues to move NNW paralleling the coast of Baja California, Mexico. The area outlined in red has a significant risk of tornadoe s the rest of the afternoon.  Below is a list of peak wind gusts so far.  Peak winds may increase farther north as the afternoon progresses.  Addition at 12 noon PDT: Sure enough, winds have increased.  Note: If you are in the San Diego area, I recommend not  traveling east on I-8. Heavy rains may cause flash flooding that will involve the highway. 
Read more