Ill-Conceived Storm Warning Experiment Expands This Year

By -
Dick McGowan
The National Weather Service, in part because of its deeply-flawed "Service Assessment" of the Joplin tornado, put an experiment in place to forecast the "impacts" of tornadoes in 2012. This was conducted at six of their offices in Kansas and Missouri.

The Wichita office issued two "catastrophic damage" warnings on April 14, 2012, and -- predictably -- they failed. Watch and listen to the "mass devastation" being forecast with this warning:

What happened? Nothing, absolutely nothing. In spite of a "tornado emergency" being issued for Conway Springs and "mass devastation" being forecast, Conway Springs was missed completely. However, if someone in Conway Springs had decided to flee the tornado based on the warning, they might have been killed by traveling east, south, or west as tornadoes moved around the city.

The NWS later issued a "tornado emergency" for east Wichita that also did not verify (the damage was light due to the tornado weakening).

It is often said that, in Washington, D.C., "nothing succeeds like failure." And, that is the case with the "impacts-based" warnings: They are spreading throughout the NWS Central Region this tornado season.
Map of NWS Central Region
There are multiple problems with this approach:
  • While we can forecast the general direction of movement of tornadic storms, the tiny movements (over say, a mile or two) cannot be forecast. Thus, Conway Springs gets missed.
  • Weather science has absolutely no ability to forecast the strength of a given tornado at a given location in time. Yes, we can say that "April 14, 2012, will be a day of big tornadoes somewhere in Kansas." We no ability to do that with a given storm on a mile-to-mile basis.
  • Even if we could do these things, it is the wrong approach. 

The basic tornado danger system -- warnings are broadcast, sirens sound and people take shelter -- stumbles over some frustrating psychology: Most people don't run for shelter at the first sign of danger but search, instead, for information to confirm it.

Experts say the Weather Service has often ignored behavioral research on delivering a "take cover" message that sinks in quickly.
So, trying to "scare" people into shelter will be counterproductive. Why? If you live in Conway Springs and you have been told "mass destruction" is imminent and nothing happens, how likely are you to take cover for an "ordinary" tornado warning?

What is the solution? It is to help people more readily internalize and confirm the warnings! 


I've prepared a paper on that subject that I will present at the American Meteorological Society's Conference on Storm Warnings and Communication in Nashville in June. 

In the meantime, take tornado warnings seriously this spring and seek shelter if one is issued for your location. But, take the "impacts" messaging with a huge grain of salt.


Addition: I heard from the NWS office in Omaha that they have opted out of this 'experiment." Good for them!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hilary's Forecast Path Shifts West; Updated 9:20am PDT

By -
Image
The forecast path of the center of Hilary has shifted a bit to the west. This increases the threat to the Southland, especially in terms of flooding.  Rainfall Note the heavy rains are forecast for Los Angeles County. Serious flash flooding may result. Because the forecast path has shifted to the west, that increases the threat of serious flooding in Los Angeles County north into Yosemite and the southern Sierra. It lessens the threat in Utah and western Arizona. While the threat of widespread flooding in Utah and Arizona lessens, note that some thunderstorms with localized heavy rain show up on the map.  In Nevada, the more western path increases the risk of serious flooding around Mt Charleston and into the central part of the state.  Here is the updated  (9am PDT) flash flood risk map. Wind There are already about 40,000 people without power in California, mostly in the center of the state.  The maps above are the peak gusts forecasted with the storm. The highest winds, in general,
Read more

Dangerous Travel Conditions - People Reportedly Stranded

By -
Image
-- Note, more current info available. Scroll up. --- Updated Information as of 8am PDT You are risking your life if you attempt to travel through the purple area.  While the rain has not begun in coastal California, I would urge you to use this time to make any preparations. Power outages have occurred already in southeast California. Here is the latest radar as of 7:55am PDT. As of 6:40am PDT , the radar indicates moderate to heavy rain falling over desert areas of Southern California and far western Arizona (click to enlarge).  Rainfall amounts for the 24 hours ending at 7am PDT show more than two inches have already fallen. There are reports from reliable sources that roads are already washed out and that people are stranded in isolated parts of the desert.  Below is a high-resolution computer model's rainfall forecast from 5am PDT to 11pm PDT Sunday. More than a foot of additional rain is forecast to fall. This will lead to catastrophic flooding.  Here is a map of current watc
Read more

Update on Tornado and Wind Potential; 12 Noon PDT

By -
Image
There was at least one tornado and at least one funnel cloud yesterday.  --- original forecast --- Hilary (the swirly symbol) continues to move NNW paralleling the coast of Baja California, Mexico. The area outlined in red has a significant risk of tornadoe s the rest of the afternoon.  Below is a list of peak wind gusts so far.  Peak winds may increase farther north as the afternoon progresses.  Addition at 12 noon PDT: Sure enough, winds have increased.  Note: If you are in the San Diego area, I recommend not  traveling east on I-8. Heavy rains may cause flash flooding that will involve the highway. 
Read more