Sequester and Weather Forecasting
I
am receiving questions via email, Facebook, and Twitter about the possible
effect of the sequester on weather forecasting and storm warnings.
I
don’t think it is wise to speculate as to how the NWS will be affected since, as the
sequester continues, we are in uncharted territory. So, allow me, in
general terms, to outline some priorities.
I
believe the nation’s meteorological core infrastructure must be preserved (and,
sooner rather than later, enhanced). By core infrastructure I am talking weather satellites, weather balloon launches, radars, computer models
and all of the rest that creates the underpinnings for storm warnings that
protect against imminent threats to life
and property of the general public. Without that infrastructure no one can make weather forecasts or
create storm warnings.
The
infrastructure must be strengthened. Previously, on this blog, I’ve talked
about the issues with America’s weather satellite program, but it goes deeper
than that. Since Hurricane Sandy, the fact that our nation is now #7 in
computer power devoted to weather forecasting has been in both the scientific
and general news. America has the most violent weather on earth. There is no
alternative to strengthening the infrastructure if we want the American weather
enterprise, including the government and the American weather industry, to be
able to generate accurate forecasts and storm warnings that save lives, protect property, and enhance economic
development and create jobs. The issues with communicating the threats during
Sandy and the Joplin tornado demonstrate there is still work to do.
As
NOAA, Congress, and the Administration ponder these issues, I recommend that
the core infrastructure be funded as the
prime requirement that underpins all else. Without the infrastructure, the American weather enterprise (federal meteorologists,
broadcasters, private sector meteorologists) will never reach its full potential.
Comments
Post a Comment