Roger Pielke, Jr. on the New IPCC Report

As I said the other day, I was just in too good a mood to discuss the IPCC's report on global warming. Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr., has taken me off the hook. Please read his piece and the comments.

Is global warming a problem? Probably. Is it a big problem? Probably not. Is there a chance of global cooling? Yes, and it deserves far more attention.
----

Dr. Judy Curry, adds this:

JC summary
My original intention for this thread was to go through and try to map the IPCC’s logical argument.  I quickly got dizzy owing to seemingly unwarranted assumptions and incomplete information (such as: did the climate models use the correct external forcing for the first decade of the 21st century, or not?).  I was then going to illustrate how any reasonable propagation of uncertainty of individual assertions/arguments through their main argument would produce much lower confidence in their overall conclusions.  For example, they seem to have eliminated high CO2 sensitivity as a problem.   Not to mention high confidence in increasing trend following 2012 (this high confidence comes right after blowing the prediction of the previous decade).  And of course not to mention the relevant journal articles that didn’t get mentioned.
Apart from these obvious flaws, reading that text and trying to follow it is positively painful.  Can someone remind me again how and why all this is supposed to be useful?
-----
And, if you really want to see the sausage being made, our friend Steve McIntyre, reveals it here. What is really discouraging is the IPCC had it right in its draft. But, in the final analysis, they couldn't bring themselves to tell the truth about how poor their forecasts have been.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilary's Forecast Path Shifts West; Updated 9:20am PDT

Dangerous Travel Conditions - People Reportedly Stranded

Update on Tornado and Wind Potential; 12 Noon PDT