tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965215084022057128.post971367525121248435..comments2024-03-28T14:54:34.646-05:00Comments on MSE CREATIVE CONSULTING BLOG: Keith Seitter on Climate ChangeMike Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17435605216805307424noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965215084022057128.post-63535101368343613502012-02-01T21:16:39.976-06:002012-02-01T21:16:39.976-06:00Anonymous, just saw your comment. I'm happy to...Anonymous, just saw your comment. I'm happy to leave it up for anyone who wishes to wishes to read it, but it is a factually inaccurate article. <br /><br />FACT: Global temperatures peaked in 1998 and have been going down slowly since (see graph at: http://meteorologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2012/01/important-story-about-lack-of-global.html ). I'll also have a post on a related topic on the blog tomorrow morning. <br /><br />The writer of the WSJ letter you link to, Dr. Kevin Trenberth, is the person who wrote a public article for a local Boulder publication pronouncing global warming "incontrovertible" while -- the same week -- privately writing (Climategate email) that it was a "travesty" that climate science could not account for the "lack of warming." <br /><br />His exact words: "The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t."<br /><br />If you don't believe me, just Google: Tenberth+missing heat+travesty+climategate and you can see the email in its entirety reproduced in several websites and in others trying to make excuses for Trenberth's honesty. <br /><br />Normally, I would not bring a personality into this but the history of saying one thing in public and a completely different thing when thought to be writing in private is pertinent to interpreting the "Journal" letter since it is the same person.Mike Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17435605216805307424noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7965215084022057128.post-14491759462175507052012-02-01T11:21:35.095-06:002012-02-01T11:21:35.095-06:00Any chance you'll give equal time to this one ...Any chance you'll give equal time to this one from today's Wall Street Journal?<br /><br />http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577193270727472662.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com